Operations Classification Output Validation

Validate Classification Output

Label in the set? Case exact? Confidence in range? The checks that keep classification output usable for routing.

Overview

Classification output fails subtly: the label is right but lowercase, the confidence is a number when you expected a level — or it's 120 on a 0–100 scale. This setup validates a CRM stage classification with two such violations: "demo" instead of the defined "Demo" (case mismatch — a warning that breaks exact-match routers), and a confidence of 120 (out of range — a fail that poisons thresholds). Both get specific repairs: return the label exactly as defined; report confidence between 0 and 100.

How to use this resource

  1. Paste the allowed labels exactly

    Case matters: the validator flags "demo" vs "Demo" because your router will too.

  2. Check confidence semantics

    Numbers get range-checked 0–100; strings must be high/medium/low — whichever contract you set.

  3. Repair before routing

    A repaired label is cheaper than a misrouted ticket — validate at the gate, not after the incident.

Why This Works

  • Exact-case checking matches how downstream code actually compares strings
  • Range validation catches the out-of-scale confidences models love to produce
  • Gate-side validation converts silent misroutes into visible repairs

Best for

  • Routing flows keyed on exact label strings
  • Pipelines thresholding on confidence values
  • Auditing classification quality across model changes

Not for

  • Defining the label set and its definitions — that's the Data Classification Prompt
  • Judging whether the label was the RIGHT call — that needs a human, not a validator

Use cases

  • Verifying labels before they route tickets or leads
  • Catching case drift that breaks exact-match automations
  • Range-checking confidence scores before thresholding

FAQ

Does this validator decide whether the AI picked the right CRM stage label?

It does not judge correctness, only conformance. Ai Output Validator checks membership in the defined set (Discovery Call, Demo, Negotiation, Follow-Up, Closed Won, Closed Lost), exact case, and confidence range, then repairs the two seeded faults: "demo" to "Demo" and 120 back into 0 to 100. Whether Demo was the right call for that activity needs a human, not this check.

How does the classification validator handle a confidence score like 120?

It flags 120 as out of range against the expected 0 to 100 scale and repairs it to a number within range. That figure is the model's self-reported confidence, not a measured accuracy, so a repaired, in-range score still is not proof the label is trustworthy for routing. The OUTPUT RULES then return only the corrected classification.

How does the validator return its fixes — corrected output only, or an explanation?

Only the corrected classification; the OUTPUT RULES require no explanations, no commentary, and no code fences, and everything already correct stays unchanged. It fixes only the two listed problems, the case mismatch and the range violation, and touches nothing else, so you get a routing-ready string rather than a diff to parse.

More resources from AI Output Validator

Resources that pair well

Related tools

Projects that use this resource

Workflows that use this resource

Tip: Save time by exploring related resources and tools that integrate with this resource.