Classify Support Tickets with AI
Billing, Technical, Account, How-To, Feature Request — ticket triage with definitions that decide the borderline cases for the model.
Overview
Ticket triage fails at the borders: is a "payment page crashes" ticket Billing or Technical? Without definitions, the model decides differently every run. This setup classifies tickets into five routing categories whose one-sentence definitions draw the borders deliberately — How-To Question is defined as "nothing is broken" precisely to keep it apart from Technical — and reports a high/medium/low confidence with each label, so your queue can auto-route the confident calls and surface the uncertain ones to a human.
Workflow
-
Generate and pipe tickets through
One ticket per call; the prompt reads the ticket text from the input below it.
-
Check the border definitions
"Nothing is broken" in How-To Question and "product defects" in Technical are doing the triage — adjust them to where YOUR borders run.
-
Route by confidence
high → straight to the queue; medium/low → human review. The confidence contract exists for exactly this split.
Why This Works
- Definitions written to exclude each other settle the borderline tickets
- Single-label edge rules force a primary-purpose decision instead of a coin flip
- Self-reported confidence makes partial automation safe — automate the easy 80%
Best for
- Support teams triaging by hand today
- Queues where Billing-vs-Technical borderline tickets cause bouncing
- Helpdesk automations with a classification step
Not for
- Pulling ticket fields (product, severity, summary) — that's the Extraction Prompt Generator
- Writing the reply — triage decides where, not what to answer
Use cases
- Routing inbound tickets to billing, technical, and account queues
- Keeping triage consistent across shifts, agents, and model runs
- Auto-routing high-confidence labels and reviewing low-confidence ones