Fix a Vague Prompt
'Make it good', 'be detailed', 'keep it interesting' — vague prompts get vague output. The fix is mechanical: replace every fuzzy word with a checkable instruction.
Format, length, and exclusions are the three levers that make AI output land in usable shape. A rewrite shows how to retrofit them onto a prompt that has none.
A prompt without output control gets whatever shape the model feels like producing — usually too long, unstructured, and including things you didn't want. Output control is three lines: the format the result should take, how long it should be, and what must stay out. This resource loads a control-free research ask and applies the control-focused rewrite, which retrofits all three lines without touching the question being asked.
Rewrite with Add Output Control
The mode adds Format, Length, and Do-not-include lines as placeholders, and converts 'be thorough' into a coverage list slot.
Fill the three lines
A table? 300 words? No vendor marketing claims? Three quick decisions, each one constraining the output where it drifts most.
Test the difference
Run the original and the rewrite on the same model — shape consistency is the first thing you'll notice.
Three control lines and a coverage slot. The mode inserts Format, Length, and Do-not-include lines as placeholders, and converts vague "be thorough" into a coverage-list slot you fill — on the loaded example that's "Research the best note-taking apps... Be thorough and cover everything important." The prompt-rewriter reshapes the prompt; it doesn't do the research itself.
It retrofits the three lines without touching the ask. The rewrite leaves the underlying question intact and only constrains the shape of the answer: a format like a table, a length cap like 300 words, and exclusions like no vendor marketing claims. You fill those placeholders yourself, then run original and rewrite on the same model to see the shape consistency.
When you're picking between finished format styles or diffing versions, not retrofitting control. notFor sends choosing among output format styles to the Prompt Formatter, and diffing controlled versus uncontrolled versions to the Prompt Version Diff. This rewrite is for a prompt that has no Format, Length, or exclusion lines at all — like the example that only says "be thorough."
'Make it good', 'be detailed', 'keep it interesting' — vague prompts get vague output. The fix is mechanical: replace every fuzzy word with a checkable instruction.
The fastest fix for mediocre AI output is rewriting the prompt: vague words become concrete instructions, hedges become commitments, and missing elements get filled.
If you can't say what makes the output right, the model can't either. Success criteria turn 'make it good' into a checkable definition of done.
See exactly what changed between v1 and v2 of a prompt — added, removed, and modified instructions, plus whether the revision reduced or introduced risk.
A side-by-side way to decide between two ChatGPT prompt drafts — scored on clarity, specificity, output control, and risk instead of gut feeling.
A set of before-and-after examples showing exactly what prompt cleanup removes — and what it deliberately leaves alone.
Rewrite a weak prompt into a stronger one — vague wording fixed, gaps filled, goal unchanged.