Prompt Engineering Tokens Cost

Token Counter for AI Prompts

Paste a prompt, get an honest token estimate — a range, not a fake-precise number — plus the cost across GPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Overview

A token is the unit models actually read and bill, and it is neither a character nor a word. This loads a typical assistant prompt and counts it: an estimated token range (because tokenizers genuinely disagree on the same text), the same text's count across four models, and what one call costs versus a thousand. The number is honest about its own uncertainty — that is the point of an estimator that refuses to lie with false precision.

How to use this resource

  1. Paste the prompt

    Any text — the report shows counts only, never echoes your content.

  2. Read the range

    Tokenizers disagree, so the estimate is a range with the model comparison beside it.

  3. Check the cost

    Per call looks trivial; the per-1,000-calls line is the real budget.

Why This Works

  • A range is honest where a single number would be a lie — tokenizers really do differ
  • Content-type detection adjusts the estimate for prose, code, and CJK
  • The cost line turns an abstract count into a number you can budget against

Best for

  • Getting a quick, honest token count
  • Sanity-checking a prompt before an API call
  • Comparing the same text across models

Not for

  • Deciding whether content fits a context window — that's the Context Window Estimator
  • Counting characters or words for a text limit — that's the Character Counter

FAQ

Why does the token counter show a range instead of one exact number?

Because tokenizers genuinely disagree on the same text, so a single figure would be false precision. This report gives 'Estimated tokens: ~70 (range 63–77)' and a per-model line — 'GPT-5 ~70 · Claude Opus ~73 · Claude Sonnet ~73 · Gemini Pro ~70' — to show the spread. The ESTIMATION NOTES are explicit that these are character-based estimates, not tokenizer output.

Does token count change between GPT, Claude, and Gemini for the same prompt?

Yes, and the MODEL NOTES list all four for one text so you can compare. The same prompt estimates at GPT-5 ~70, Claude Opus ~73, Claude Sonnet ~73, and Gemini Pro ~70, because each provider tokenizes differently. The note adds these are a count, not a fit check — for 'will it fit?' use the Context Window Estimator.

Can I trust the cost estimate for my actual API bill?

Treat it as a budgeting estimate, not exact billing. The report prices this prompt on GPT-5 and warns that pricing is approximate and 'providers change rates — verify before relying on a number', while the token figure itself is a range, not tokenizer output. The per-1,000-calls line is the honest place to budget, but confirm the real rate with your provider.

More resources from Token Counter

Resources that pair well

Related tools

Tip: Save time by exploring related resources and tools that integrate with this resource.