Technical Documentation Prompt
Overview, Key Concepts, How It Works, Usage, Troubleshooting — docs pages with the same shape for every feature, and code in every usage section.
Overview
Documentation rots fastest when every page has its own structure — readers can't build navigation instincts and writers can't tell what's missing. This setup generates docs pages against a five-section skeleton with tech-docs rules: define every term at first use (assume a competent reader new to THIS system), document what the system does rather than roadmap dreams. Require Code Examples puts a fenced, language-tagged, usable-as-written block in every behavior-describing section.
Workflow
-
One skeleton, every feature
Each feature's page comes back with the same five sections — navigation instincts transfer.
-
Watch the term rule
"Define every term at first use" assumes the right reader: competent, but new to this system.
-
Trust the Troubleshooting slot
A pinned section means failure modes get documented while they're remembered, not after the third support ticket.
Why This Works
- Sibling-shaped pages teach readers where to look
- First-use definitions beat a glossary nobody opens
- Required code keeps usage sections concrete
Best for
- Docs sites where pages should feel like siblings
- Teams onboarding engineers through documentation
- Systems with jargon that needs first-use definitions
Not for
- API endpoint references — the API Documentation setup adds tables and stricter rules
- Summarizing existing docs — that's the Structured Summary Prompt
Use cases
- Documenting features in an identical page structure
- Forcing term definitions where readers actually need them
- Keeping Troubleshooting from being forgotten