Content Information Architecture Sitemap

Sitemap & Site IA Spec Prompt — Pages, Navigation, and Structure

Turn website goals, audiences, content types, and conversion paths into a sitemap and information-architecture spec: navigation, a page inventory, hierarchy, URLs, user journeys, and an internal-linking plan.

Overview

A website structured page by page becomes a maze — navigation no one can follow and pages that don't connect to a goal. This prompt builds the information architecture first: from the site's purpose, audiences, content types, and conversion paths it produces an IA specification — primary and secondary navigation, a full page inventory, the page hierarchy, URL/slug recommendations, the key user journeys, content requirements per page, an internal-linking plan, indexability notes, and the IA risks and open questions. It is a planning artifact a team builds from, not a crawl: it does not draw a visual sitemap diagram, generate an XML sitemap file, or run a technical SEO audit — it produces a sitemap-ready textual outline you can turn into either. It is for organizing a multi-page site (a company site, a docs site, or a knowledge base), distinct from structuring a single long reference document.

How to use this resource

  1. Start from goals, not pages

    Navigation and page inventory trace to audience goals and conversion paths, so the structure serves visitors, not the org chart.

  2. Make the hierarchy explicit

    A page tree, URLs, and per-page content requirements turn a vague "site map" into something a team can build.

  3. Connect and de-risk

    An internal-linking plan ties pages to the conversion paths, and IA risks become open questions instead of post-launch surprises.

Why This Works

  • Grouping by visitor intent instead of internal structure is the single biggest driver of navigability
  • A per-page purpose and content requirement prevents the orphan pages a page-by-page build accumulates
  • Naming IA risks as open questions surfaces the grouping decisions that are expensive to change after launch

Best for

  • Planning a company website's structure and navigation
  • Planning a documentation or knowledge-base information architecture
  • Turning pages and user goals into a sitemap
  • Designing navigation and hierarchy before writing page copy

Not for

  • Structuring a single long reference document — that's Structure Large Reference Documents
  • Writing the page copy — use the landing-page copy prompts
  • Generating an XML sitemap file — this is an IA planning spec, not a crawler file
  • Technical SEO crawling or indexability audits — use an SEO-specific tool

Use cases

  • Planning the sitemap and navigation for a company website before writing pages
  • Designing the information architecture of a documentation site or knowledge base
  • Turning a pile of pages and goals into a navigable hierarchy with an internal-linking plan

FAQ

Will this produce an actual XML sitemap file or a visual diagram?

Neither — it produces a textual IA specification. A Rules line states it does "not draw a visual sitemap, generate an XML sitemap file, or claim to crawl the site." What you get is item 12, a SITEMAP-READY OUTLINE that "a developer or a diagramming tool can render." The markdown-output-builder shapes the prompt; you run it, then feed the outline into whatever tool draws or crawls.

How does this decide which pages the site actually needs?

Every page must trace to an audience goal or a content type you supplied — a Rules line bars "speculative pages." You paste the purpose, audiences, content types, and conversion paths; PAGE INVENTORY groups each page by section with a one-line purpose, and grouping follows "how visitors think, not by how the company is organized." Unresolved grouping goes into IA RISKS & OPEN QUESTIONS rather than being guessed.

Can I use this to structure one long reference document instead of a multi-page site?

It's built for multi-page sites, not a single document. The output is site-shaped — PRIMARY NAVIGATION, PAGE HIERARCHY as an indented tree, KEY USER JOURNEYS across pages, and an INTERNAL-LINKING PLAN toward the conversion paths. Those assume many pages connecting to goals. Organizing sections within one long document is a different job, which the notFor points to Structure Large Reference Documents for.

More resources from Markdown Output Builder

Resources that pair well

Related tools

Projects that use this resource

Workflows that use this resource

Tip: Save time by exploring related resources and tools that integrate with this resource.