Prompt Engineering Context Decisions

Preserve Project Decisions — Settled Stays Settled

New sessions love to reopen settled questions. Forensic fidelity carries every decision verbatim — and overriding one requires raising an explicit question first.

Overview

The most expensive failure of session boundaries is decision amnesia: the new chat cheerfully proposes offset pagination after three sessions of settling on cursors. This setup is decision preservation at maximum strength — a design-lock session in Forensic fidelity, where all five recorded decisions travel verbatim, the underlying assumption is first-class, and the handoff instructions add the forensic rule: a decision can be challenged only by raising an explicit question, never silently overridden. Settled stays settled, or the disagreement at least becomes visible.

How to use this resource

  1. Capture decisions verbatim

    The original wording travels — "cursor-based everywhere, offset rejected" stays exactly that strong.

  2. Go forensic

    Every decision and assumption travels; nothing is capped away.

  3. Gate the overrides

    The forensic rule converts silent reversals into explicit, answerable questions.

Why This Works

  • Verbatim decisions resist the softening that paraphrase introduces
  • The override gate makes disagreement visible instead of accidental
  • Forensic completeness ends the which-decisions-made-the-cut lottery

Best for

  • API and architecture design work
  • Projects where decision drift caused rework
  • Decision-heavy sessions feeding implementation sessions

Not for

  • Recording decisions for human stakeholders — that's a summary, the Structured Summary Prompt's world
  • Permanent team conventions that outlive the project phase — future Project Context Builder territory

Use cases

  • Locking design decisions across implementation sessions
  • Stopping the third relitigation of pagination
  • Making decision challenges explicit instead of silent

FAQ

How do I keep a new AI chat from reopening decisions we already settled?

The HANDOFF INSTRUCTIONS carry each KEY DECISION verbatim (cursor pagination, RFC 7807 errors, ULIDs, and the rest) and add the forensic rule: if the model thinks a decision is wrong, it must "raise it as an explicit question — never override it." You paste the package as the first message of the new chat. The assistant you paste it into still decides how faithfully to follow it.

What does Forensic fidelity carry that a lighter setting wouldn't?

Forensic carries all five recorded decisions plus the underlying assumption verbatim, deduplicated but not paraphrased — nothing capped away — so you avoid the which-decisions-made-the-cut lottery. The package also tells the next session to quote it rather than reconstruct from memory. It's for feeding a design phase into implementation, not for recording decisions for human stakeholders (that's a summary).

More resources from Context Handoff Builder

Resources that pair well

Related tools

Guides for this resource

Tip: Save time by exploring related resources and tools that integrate with this resource.