PRD Prompt — Consistent Product Requirement Documents
Problem, Goals, Non-Goals, numbered Requirements, Risks, Timeline — PRDs identical in structure across every author and feature.
Overview
PRD review breaks down when every author invents their own structure: requirements hide in prose, non-goals go missing, risks live in someone's head. This setup pins the six-section PRD skeleton under Strict consistency — every section present, exact order, no merging — with PRD-specific rules: requirements numbered (R1, R2…) so reviews can reference them, and every requirement testable ("no 'should be fast' without a number"). Required Tables keeps requirement matrices as actual tables.
Workflow
-
One prompt, every PRD
Generate once; each feature's details go below the prompt and come back in the same six sections.
-
Reference requirements by number
R1, R2… numbering is in the contract — review comments and test plans can finally point at something stable.
-
Defend the Non-Goals section
Strict mode means it can't be omitted or merged — scope creep's cheapest insurance.
Why This Works
- Identical structure makes ten PRDs comparable in one sitting
- The testability rule converts wishes into requirements
- Strict consistency stops section drift between authors
Best for
- Product teams with multiple PRD authors
- Reviews that reference requirements by ID
- Organizations templating their product process
Not for
- Summarizing an existing PRD for execs — that's the Structured Summary Prompt
- Tracking PRD revisions — that's the Prompt Version Diff for prompts, your VCS for docs
Use cases
- Making every PRD reviewable in the same way
- Forcing requirements to be numbered and testable
- Keeping Non-Goals from silently disappearing