Market Research Prompt Workflow
A sequential prompt workflow for market research: scope the question, set evidence rules, map the landscape, hunt counter-evidence, and end with a stress-tested verdict.
Overview
Market research collapses in single prompts: 'evaluate this market' returns a confident essay with no evidence trail. Run as a workflow, the same goal becomes auditable — the question gets scoped before any searching, evidence rules get set before claims, every candidate is judged on the same criteria, and the recommendation survives a deliberate counter-evidence hunt before anyone acts on it. This resource loads a full advanced-complexity market evaluation sequence ready to run.
Workflow
-
Build the loaded workflow
Advanced complexity loads the full 10-phase research arc including counter-evidence and red-teaming.
-
Respect the scoping step
Everything downstream judges against Step 1's criteria — spend real attention validating them.
-
Don't skip the hunt
The counter-evidence step is what separates research from confirmation. It's also the step single prompts never do.
-
Ship the brief
The final step packages everything for the decision-maker — under 400 words, gaps stated honestly.
Why This Works
- Scoped questions give the research something to be wrong about — that's what makes it checkable
- Same-criteria evaluation makes candidate comparisons fair instead of vibes-weighted
- A deliberate counter-evidence pass catches the failure modes optimistic research misses
Best for
- Build/buy/enter decisions resting on market evidence
- Research whose conclusion someone will challenge
- Analysts who need their AI research to show its work
Not for
- Rewriting a single research prompt — that's the Prompt Rewriter
- Comparing two research prompts — that's the Prompt Comparator
Use cases
- Evaluating a market before committing build resources
- Replacing 'research this and tell me' with an auditable sequence
- Producing a decision brief that survives skeptical review