Competitor Analysis Prompt Workflow
A sequential prompt workflow for competitor analysis: scope what the analysis must decide, evaluate every competitor on the same criteria, and end with findings a pricing or positioning call can rest on.
Overview
'Analyze our competitors' in one prompt returns a feature-table essay that informs nothing. The workflow version starts from the decision — what will this analysis change? — sets the criteria before looking at anyone, evaluates every competitor on those same criteria with evidence notes, and synthesizes into findings with confidence levels. This resource loads a 7-step competitor analysis scoped to a real trigger: a quarterly pricing decision.
Workflow
-
Build the loaded workflow
The pricing-decision goal at 7 steps loads the research arc with counter-evidence included.
-
Lock the decision first
Step 1 names the decision this analysis serves — it's what keeps the analysis from becoming an essay.
-
Demand evidence notes
The evaluation matrix marks unverified claims explicitly — those are your follow-up list, not your conclusions.
-
Rerun quarterly
Save the workflow; next quarter, same sequence, fresh evidence. Comparable analyses compound.
Why This Works
- Decision-scoping converts 'know the competitors' into 'answer this question'
- Same-criteria evaluation makes five competitors actually comparable
- Unverified-claim marking keeps confident-sounding gaps out of the conclusions
Best for
- Pricing, positioning, and roadmap decisions that need competitive grounding
- Recurring quarterly competitive reviews
- Teams whose competitor docs go stale because they're painful to produce
Not for
- Comparing two of your own prompts — that's the Prompt Comparator
- A quick one-competitor lookup — one prompt suffices
Use cases
- Analyzing competitors with a specific decision as the anchor
- Replacing feature-table essays with evidence-backed evaluation matrices
- Preparing the competitive input for a pricing or positioning call